2001 Audi TT vs. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi TT (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. (133 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2001 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi TT (285 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm). This means 2001 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi TT | 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Camaro |
Year Released | 2001 | 1988 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 223 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76.2 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2580 mm |