2001 Audi TT vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi TT (178 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (124 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi TT weights approximately 124 kg more than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi TT (225 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (181 Nm). This means 2001 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Audi TT 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model TT Tracker
Year Released 2001 1995
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 1983 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 178 HP 124 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 225 Nm 181 Nm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1390 kg 1266 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2210 mm