2001 Audi TT vs. 2000 Rover 75
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi TT (178 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2000 Rover 75. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2000 Rover 75.
Because 2001 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi TT (225 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Rover 75. (161 Nm). This means 2001 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi TT | 2000 Rover 75 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 75 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 161 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |