2001 Audi TT vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi TT (178 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi TT weights approximately 950 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi TT | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Audi | Westfield |
| Model | TT | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2320 mm |
