2001 Audi TT vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (391 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2001 Audi TT. (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 722 kg more than 2001 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (560 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi TT. (285 Nm). This means 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi TT. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2001 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2001 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi TT | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Audi | Land Rover |
| Model | TT | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 4197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 391 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 560 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2632 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 88 L |
