2001 Audi TT vs. 2009 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2001 Audi TT. (178 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi TT.
Because 2001 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan 350Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 350Z (358 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi TT. (225 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi TT | 2009 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | 350Z |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 309 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 358 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 95.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |