2001 Audi TT vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2001 Audi TT. (178 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi TT.
Because 2001 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi TT. (225 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi TT | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Ranger |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 322 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3193 mm |