2001 Bentley Arnage vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2001 Bentley Arnage is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Bentley Arnage (402 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 376 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 1919 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Bentley Arnage | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Bentley | DAF |
Model | Arnage | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 402 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2585 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2130 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3120 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 33 L |