2001 Bentley Continental vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bentley Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bentley Continental would be higher. At 6,746 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bentley Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Bentley Continental (421 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 298 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (123 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Bentley Continental should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bentley Continental weights approximately 1105 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Bentley Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Bentley Continental (875 Nm) has 714 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (161 Nm). This means 2001 Bentley Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Bentley Continental | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Bentley | Toyota |
Model | Continental | Matrix |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6746 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 421 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 875 Nm | 161 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 91 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2450 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5360 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.2 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 28.1 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 45 L |