2001 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 would be higher. At 6,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2001 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 (500 HP) has 234 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (266 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 621 kg more than 2001 Bizzarrini BZ-2001.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Cadillac |
| Model | BZ-2001 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6900 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 266 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1821 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
