2001 BMW 316 vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW 316 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2001 BMW 316. (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW 316.
Because 2001 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW 316. (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW 316 | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | 316 | C70 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
