2001 BMW 320 vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 2001 BMW 320 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2001 BMW 320. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW 320.
Because 2001 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW 320 (355 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 2001 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW 320 | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 320 | Elan |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 355 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2270 mm |