2001 BMW 320 vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2001 BMW 320 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Matra-Simca M72 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW 320 (148 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 2001 BMW 320 has manual transmission. 2001 BMW 320 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW 320 | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
Make | BMW | Matra-Simca |
Model | 320 | M72 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 50 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |