2001 BMW 320 vs. 2012 Suzuki Kizashi

To start off, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2001 BMW 320. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW 320.

Because 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW 320 (355 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki Kizashi. (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2001 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki Kizashi.

Compare all specifications:

2001 BMW 320 2012 Suzuki Kizashi
Make BMW Suzuki
Model 320 Kizashi
Year Released 2001 2012
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 355 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1470 kg 1470 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 4651 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1821 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Consumption 4.4 L/100km 8.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 7.6 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 63 L