2001 BMW 750 vs. 1954 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 BMW 750 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW 750 (322 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2001 BMW 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW 750 | 1954 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 750 | 62 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 5423 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3290 mm |