2001 BMW 750 vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW 750 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (12 cylinders), 2001 BMW 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2001 BMW 750. (322 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW 750. (490 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW 750.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW 750 | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 750 | XF |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 490 Nm | 560 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2910 mm |