2001 BMW Compact vs. 1952 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 285 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Compact. (237 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Compact.

Compare all specifications:

2001 BMW Compact 1952 Jaguar XK
Make BMW Jaguar
Model Compact XK
Year Released 2001 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2501 cc 3441 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 193 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 290 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1580 kg 1295 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1570 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 63 L