2001 BMW Compact vs. 1960 Morgan 4
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Compact is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1960 Morgan 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 1960 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 900 kg more than 1960 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Compact (237 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Morgan 4. (72 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Compact will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 1960 Morgan 4 | |
Make | BMW | Morgan |
Model | Compact | 4 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 72 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2450 mm |