2001 BMW Compact vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Compact is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Compact (237 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Compact will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Compact | 1963 Seat 600 | |
| Make | BMW | Seat |
| Model | Compact | 600 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |
