2001 BMW Compact vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2001 BMW Compact. (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Compact. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 466 kg more than 2001 BMW Compact. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Compact | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Compact | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 2046 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 79 L |
