2001 BMW Compact vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Compact is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Compact | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | BMW | Lotus |
| Model | Compact | Elan |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
