2001 BMW Compact vs. 1972 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 205 kg more than 1972 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 1972 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | Compact | Challenger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5208 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2810 mm |