2001 BMW Compact vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,848 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 210 kg more than 1980 Volvo 260. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Compact (237 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (230 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Compact will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | Compact | 260 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2660 mm |