2001 BMW Compact vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Compact is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 254 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2001 BMW Compact is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Compact. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Compact | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Compact | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |
