2001 BMW Compact vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Compact is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Compact. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Compact | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | Compact | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4690 mm |
