2001 BMW Compact vs. 1999 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2001 BMW Compact. (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Compact. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 218 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 1999 Dodge Charger | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | Compact | Charger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 4760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |