2001 BMW Compact vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Compact is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 372 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Compact (237 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Compact will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2001 BMW Compact has manual transmission. 2001 BMW Compact will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 2000 Ford Equator | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Compact | Equator |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1787 cc |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 160 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3260 mm |