2001 BMW Compact vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2001 BMW Compact is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2001 BMW Compact. (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Compact. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 270 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (450 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Compact. (237 Nm). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Compact.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | BMW | Opel |
Model | Compact | Omega |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1310 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 52 L |