2001 BMW Compact vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Compact. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Compact would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2004 GMC Safari. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Safari weights approximately 502 kg more than 2001 BMW Compact.
Because 2004 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Compact. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Compact. (237 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Compact.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Compact | 2004 GMC Safari | |
| Make | BMW | GMC |
| Model | Compact | Safari |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 2082 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 102 L |
