2001 BMW Compact vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Compact. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Compact would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 50 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Compact (237 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Compact will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | Compact | K2700 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |