2001 BMW Compact vs. 2006 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Compact. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Compact would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2001 BMW Compact. (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Compact. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 502 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Compact. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Compact.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 2006 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | Compact | SSR |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 401 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1078 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 95 L |