2001 BMW Compact vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Compact. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Compact would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2001 BMW Compact. (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Compact.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Compact. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Compact. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Compact.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Compact | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | Compact | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4016 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 324 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 84 L |
