2001 BMW Compact vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Compact. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Compact would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Compact is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (139 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 446 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Compact (237 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Compact will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | Compact | 3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 182 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |