2001 BMW Compact vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Compact. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Compact would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Compact is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2001 BMW Compact. (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Compact. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Compact weights approximately 155 kg more than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Compact (237 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Compact will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | Compact | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 211 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |