2001 BMW Compact vs. 2009 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Compact. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Compact would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW Compact is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Compact (193 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Compact should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Compact (237 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (142 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Compact will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. 2009 Chevrolet Cruze has automatic transmission and 2001 BMW Compact has manual transmission. 2001 BMW Compact will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Cruze will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Compact | 2009 Chevrolet Cruze | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Compact | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
