2001 BMW Compact vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Compact. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Compact would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 167 more horse power than 2001 BMW Compact. (193 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Compact.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Compact. (237 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Compact.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Compact | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | Compact | Commodore |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |