2001 BMW L7 vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW L7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW L7 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (12 cylinders), 2001 BMW L7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW L7 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW L7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 85 kg more than 2001 BMW L7.
Because 2001 BMW L7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW L7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW L7. (350 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW L7.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW L7 | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | L7 | BLS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 365 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1635 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 58 L |