2001 BMW M vs. 1955 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 BMW M is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 625 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1955 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2001 BMW M has manual transmission. 2001 BMW M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1955 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW M | 1955 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M | 62 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5424 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3290 mm |
