2001 BMW M vs. 1962 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2001 BMW M is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 767 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Because 2001 BMW M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW M | 1962 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 208 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 82 L |
