2001 BMW M vs. 1964 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2001 BMW M is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (325 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M weights approximately 815 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 1964 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | M | 2CV |
Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 63 L |