2001 BMW M vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2001 BMW M is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (325 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 29 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW M | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | M | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3300 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1404 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2960 mm |
