2001 BMW M vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2001 BMW M is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (325 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M weights approximately 520 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | M | 850 K |
Year Released | 2001 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |