2001 BMW M vs. 1979 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2001 BMW M is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M weights approximately 415 kg more than 1979 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M (345 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2001 BMW M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 1979 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | M | 1300 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |