2001 BMW M vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2001 BMW M is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2001 BMW M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M. (345 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2001 BMW M has manual transmission. 2001 BMW M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW M | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | M | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
