2001 BMW M vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2001 BMW M is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M weights approximately 260 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 2001 BMW M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | BMW | Proton |
Model | M | 300 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2450 mm |