2001 BMW M vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (325 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 991 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (353 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M. (350 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | M | Express |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 102.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 2366 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 6210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3940 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 117 L |