2001 BMW M vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M would be higher. At 4,818 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (270 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 95 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (386 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M. (345 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | M | Express |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 4818 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 386 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.9 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.6 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 117 L |