2001 BMW M vs. 2004 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (220 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 580 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M (345 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW M | 2004 GMC Canyon | |
| Make | BMW | GMC |
| Model | M | Canyon |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 72 L |
