2001 BMW M vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (325 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 899 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M. (350 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | M | Armada |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 106 L |