2001 BMW M vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2001 BMW M. (325 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 460 kg more than 2001 BMW M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M. (350 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M | 300 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 5653 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 529 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 72 L |